The Hype vs. Reality of Ancelotti’s Brazil

Let’s address the elephant in the room: no coach—not even a three-time Champions League winner—can overhaul a national team’s DNA in two training sessions. Brazil’s 1-1 draw against Ecuador wasn’t about Ancelotti’s tactics failing; it was about the raw material he’s working with. As someone who crunches player movement data for ESPN, I saw alarming trends:

1. The Death of the ‘Complete Attacker’
Modern elite teams (think Spain in Euro 2024) prioritize players like Pedri or Yamal—technicians who dominate through possession intelligence, not dribbling bravado. Contrast this with Brazil’s Vinícius Jr.: explosive but predictable, often choosing pointless solo runs over releasing teammates (see his 61st-minute turnover). Even rising star Estevão lacks the spatial awareness of Europe’s top playmakers.

2. Midfield Malaise
Brazil started with three defensive midfielders—a safe but telling choice. Bruno Guimarães? A budget Kroos without the passing range. Casemiro anchored well, but when your most progressive passer is a center-back (hello, Marquinhos), you’re in trouble. Compare this to France’s Rabiot or Spain’s Rodri, who blend destruction with distribution.

3. Tactical Bright Spots
Ancelotti did implant subtle fixes: more vertical passes from defense (though成功率低) and using Richarlison as a battering ram. His son Davide joining as assistant coach could address Brazil’s notorious lack of structured training—a glimmer of hope.

Verdict: Patience Required

This was always a glorified audition. Until Brazil accepts their technical gap versus Europe (no more calling up those ‘ball-on-fire’ veterans), even Ancelotti’s famed man-management won’t spark miracles. Watch for his adjustments in the Copa América—but temper expectations.